Vancouver, home of the protest
It’s no great secret that Vancouver’s a left-leaning city, or at least has a very vocal left wing minority. There’s committees, groups, and parties that represent the usual narrow spectrum of idealism: homes for the homeless, abolish poverty, stop the Olympics, stop police brutality, stop the war (doesn’t matter which one), open more hospitals, and so on. It’s good that people believe in something and want to speak out about it, but personally I am tired of the anti-Olympic sentiment of activists in Vancouver. Essentially, for protesters here the Olympics are the scapegoat for the ills of our society: if we weren’t hosting the games, we’d have treated all the junkies, eliminated hospital wait lists, provided free tuition, and we’d be driving space cars to work that run on leftovers from your fridge. Last week while on a lunchtime walk, there was a group of perhaps a dozen stereotypical lefties protesting something outside a police convention. I didn’t stick around to find out what their current crusade was, but naturally a placard read something about “No Olympics”.
This really has to stop. Honestly. The Olympics are past the point of no return; they’re coming, and even if they weren’t, that money would not be used to cure the homeless problem. Move on to something else.
Here’s a concept for the kids with a grudge to bear: get a job that pays a lot. Use the money you earn to lobby politicians — they don’t speak to punks in army boots and rats-nest dreadlocks. Politicans answer to money. If lobbying doesn’t work, become a politician instead. But don’t run on your idealist nonsense, otherwise you end up as the Green Party. Accept the fact that our world runs on capitalism, that cars run on gasoline, and people get addicted to heroin. These “problems” can be eased, but not fixed.
In case you’re wondering where I put myself on the political spectrum: I’m nowhere. I don’t support enough of either the left or the right wing to think I belong to either. Lately I see the world in terms of idealism vs. realism. It is great to have ideals, and to believe that things should be and can be better. But ideals have to be tempered with realism, the acknowlegement that things in our world are not going to change at the drop of a hat, and that for every person that sees an issue as a problem, there’s another person to whom that issue is an advantage. At the end of the day people need to be realistic about their problems and their proposed solutions. And “stopping the Olympics” is not realistic.
